Hey, you. I love you.
Hey, you. I love you too.
May 2013
September 2012
Play
August 2012
Immigration Equality for Same Sex Couples →
capwiz.com
Currently, it’s illegal for same sex couples to apply for an American Visa, even if one partner is an American citizen. As an individual in a binational (United States and England) same sex relationship, I believe I should have the equal right to live with my partner in the country in which I was raised. Nancy Pelosi just sponsored a bill before Congress to allow equal rights to all individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation. Now she needs the support of her colleagues.
Please click on this link and Take Action. All you have to do is fill in your basic information to send an E-mail to your Senator and/or Congressman.
Share this link please.
I have so much respect for you and Lucy, you must have like the busiest lifestyles, then on top of that you’re miles apart for quite a while, then you always make time for people who are going through tough stages. You both make the perfect couple omg .. Anyway .. Will you both ever live together, please stay with each other forever?
July 2012
If you and Lucy someday broke up, will you still remember her and think of her, and everything, even if you already had another girlfriend?
Of course I would. I’m pretty sure Lucy and I will never break up, but if we did, she would always hold a lovely, respectful huge piece of my heart.
where are you from?
Michigan
Play
from zero to internet explorer how ignored do you feelwhite pencil crayon.
Terms and Conditions.
Warning label on cookie dough packages.
“You must be 18 or older” webpage warnings
myspace
crocs
First piece of bread in a loaf.
I hate how if a woman has sex with a bunch of guys she’s considered a slut, but if a guy does the exact same thing, he’s ‘gay’
June 2012
“Something I’ve always found interesting (if not slightly disheartening) is how often I get asked ‘so, who wears the trousers in your relationship?’ or, ‘which one, out of the two of you, is more masculine?’ I’ve always thought it odd that when it comes to love and relationships, marital or otherwise, there’s an assumed ‘role,’ for both parties. Kaelyn and I have never been able to understand why people look so astounded when we reply, ‘neither of us. We’re equal.’
We like to think that we exist as a unit, but within that, we are two separate people, with individual ideas, morals, interests, and opinions. Conveniently for us, these notions aren’t all that different, and there’s a lot of overlap - but that doesn’t lessen the significance of either of us in the relationship, physically nor mentally/emotionally. We value and appreciate each other immensely, and although we’ve never openly discussed it, there’s a definite - albeit unspoken - agreement that to assert ones beliefs and morals with disregard to the other would be disrespectful and uncalled for. To discuss, yes. To argue, to fight over, to challenge, yes. But never to alter, to destroy, nor to change unwillingly. There is an overwhelming tendency when it comes to analysing relationships to expect specific ‘roles’ and/or ‘jobs’ that each person is expected to do. These roles, unfortunately, are not equal. The phrase, ‘who wears the trousers?’ makes explicit links to male authority (the male/masculine connotations arise with the word ‘trousers’) and implies that, when wearing the trousers, one is both a) male and b) in power over the other.
Kaelyn and I have never discussed who should wear the trousers (I use the term ‘should’ through gritted teeth - ‘should’ indicates obligation and duty - bitch please, far from it!), because, quite simply, it never occurred to us. Moreover, it’s unnecessary. We don’t need a power struggle. We are in a lesbian relationship - no males involved - so why would we need a man, and why does one person need to have power over the other in a relationship? What’s so wrong with being equal?” —Lucy & Kaelyn.: Lucy’s Midnight Ramblings #1: What’s so wrong with being equal?
We like to think that we exist as a unit, but within that, we are two separate people, with individual ideas, morals, interests, and opinions. Conveniently for us, these notions aren’t all that different, and there’s a lot of overlap - but that doesn’t lessen the significance of either of us in the relationship, physically nor mentally/emotionally. We value and appreciate each other immensely, and although we’ve never openly discussed it, there’s a definite - albeit unspoken - agreement that to assert ones beliefs and morals with disregard to the other would be disrespectful and uncalled for. To discuss, yes. To argue, to fight over, to challenge, yes. But never to alter, to destroy, nor to change unwillingly. There is an overwhelming tendency when it comes to analysing relationships to expect specific ‘roles’ and/or ‘jobs’ that each person is expected to do. These roles, unfortunately, are not equal. The phrase, ‘who wears the trousers?’ makes explicit links to male authority (the male/masculine connotations arise with the word ‘trousers’) and implies that, when wearing the trousers, one is both a) male and b) in power over the other.
Kaelyn and I have never discussed who should wear the trousers (I use the term ‘should’ through gritted teeth - ‘should’ indicates obligation and duty - bitch please, far from it!), because, quite simply, it never occurred to us. Moreover, it’s unnecessary. We don’t need a power struggle. We are in a lesbian relationship - no males involved - so why would we need a man, and why does one person need to have power over the other in a relationship? What’s so wrong with being equal?” —Lucy & Kaelyn.: Lucy’s Midnight Ramblings #1: What’s so wrong with being equal?
Play
how do i go about asking a girl on a date please help
Just ask her! Seriously! The worst you are going to get is a “No”. If that’s too daring for you, just hang out with her a lot, be yourself, and I’m sure something will develop if it’s meant to be
